Wednesday, November 2, 2011

What should be the next step in her case?

A 70-year-old female comes to the  with a Two-hour history of retrosternal chest pain, dyspnea, and sweating. The First  ECG shows ST elevation in anterior chest leads. Lady proceeds immediately to coronary angiography where a 100% proximal LAD artery occlusion is seen. The lesion is successfully opened with  the help of angioplasty followed by stent implantation, with resultant normal  TIMI III flow. An echocardiogram reveals a LV EF of 30% with RWMA along the  anterior and lateral walls. In ICU telemetry reveals frequent PVCs and infrequent episodes on nonsustained Ventricular Tachychardia (3–5 beats). What should be the next step in her case?


a. Conservative Treatment and implantation of an ICD


b. Conservative Treatment and implantation of an ICD if VT is induced


c. Conservative Treatment and implantation of an ICD if a signal averaged ECG is abnormal


d. Conservative Treatment and defer implantation of an ICD


e. Conservative Treatment and refer for radiofrequency ablation of the VT


Please  Leave your comments and explanations in the box below

4 comments:

  1. In theory - you've "corrected" the problem in her "culprit artery" by rapid PCI with restoration of flow (assuming as implied, that the rest of her cath is unremarkable). Initial EF is reduced (30%) - but the regional wall motion abnormality may improve with a tincture of time (as may her infrequent episodes of 3-5 beats of NSVT) - so I'd vote for D (Conservative Treatment & Defer Implantation of ICD)- Ken Grauer, MD (ekgpress@mac.com)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the answer and examination. By the WsyI have Joined Your Group. Great Groop !

    ReplyDelete
  3. The answer is D

    The patient described had a large MI that was treated with percutaneous revascularization.
    PVCs and nonsustained VT are common. This type of patient was studied in
    DINAMIT. Although these patients are at relatively high risk of both sudden and
    total mortality, implantation of an ICD did not improve outcomes. If the patient has
    periods of sustained VT, an antiarrhythmic should be considered. Otherwise, medical
    therapy alone is appropriate, with follow-up assessment of her EF to determine if any
    functional recovery results from the revascularization.

    ReplyDelete